Jump to Navigation

The New Era of Educationally Related Mental Health Services

With the passage of Assembly Bill 114 ("AB 114") on June 30, 2011, Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) have been responsible for the provision of mental health services as part of a students' special education and related services. Previously, county mental health providers had the responsibility to provide such services and in the 10 months since LEAs have been providing these services, mental health services have evolved to have a minimal presence in the special education setting.

Under the IDEA, related services should still include mental health services necessary for a student to benefit from his or her education. These include counseling services, psychological services, rehabilitation services, social work services, and residential placement services. Medication management was not afforded protection under federal law, so LEAs first dispensed with that service. Despite, the remaining responsibility over the milieu of required services, parents have seen LEAs shirk from their responsibilities and only provide minimal counseling services to their children.

The most drastic change though has been in regards to placement in residential treatment facilities. LEAs are placing less and less students residentially now that they are burdened with the costs of both the education and placement. It does not appear that students are suffering from less mental health issues or require fewer services to warrant this reduction, so this change is wholly inappropriate.

As a parent, if your child has significant mental health issues the best advice is to continue to request appropriate assessments, services and if necessary, residential placement.

Contact Our Office

If you have any questions about your child's special education services, Contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information.

We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you.

Do I Have To Sign This IEP?

You just had your child's IEP, and a bunch of information was thrown out there by multiple professionals over the course of a couple of hours. The school district administrator is now asking you to sign the place in the IEP document which indicates that you consent to the IEP. What do you do? Is it ok not to sign it?

The short answer is yes, it is perfectly acceptable not to sign consent to an IEP at the meeting itself. In fact, it would probably be better if you didn't sign consent to an IEP document until you have had to take it home and really read it over and consider everything it says and everything that is being offered to your child. You most likely did not have the opportunity to go over the IEP document in advance of the meeting itself, so you may have questions or concerns that were not brought up at the meeting once you have a chance to review the document.

What is the downside of not signing consent to the IEP document? Any services offered in that specific IEP document will not be implemented by the school district by law until you provide consent to it. You may provide consent to some of the document, while dissenting to other parts you do not agree with (i.e. consenting to placement by dissenting to the amount of special education services). In the meantime, the last agreed upon IEP services and goals will remain in place until you consent to their change.

You might have questions about what is appropriate, or a school district might be pressuring you into signing the IEP document. The attorneys at Augustin Egelsee can advise you regarding the appropriateness of your child's IEP and whether or not you should consent to the implementation of services.

We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you.

Contact Our Office

Contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information.

Bullying Special Education Students Spotlighted in New Documentary

Bullying is a problem for many children who are eligible for special education services, whether it is due to a physically apparent disability or by the fact that the child is accessing related services. Many of these children can find themselves at the mercy of a bully just for being different. A new documentary "Bully," releasing on April 13, looks at the problem of bullying in school and two of the stories follow concern two special education students.

In watching the film, however, you may not know that any of the children have disabilities. According to an article in Education Week published on April 11, 2012 about the film, the filmmakers deliberately did not bring up the disabilities of the two students, both diagnosed with Asperger's. The conscious choice was based on the fact that the filmmakers did not want the students' Autism Spectrum Disorders to be blamed as the reason the children were different and thus being bullied.

For many parents of children with disabilities though they have to face the hard reality everyday that their children are bullied because of the fact they are different. It will be interesting to see then whether the film's general advocacy against all children being bullied will also shed light on the specific problem of children with disabilities being bullied or do it a disservice by not specifically spotlighting the students' disabilities.

Contact Our Office

If you have any questions about your child's special education services, Contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information.

We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you.

Incident Reports

A recent decision from the CA Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) held that Parents are not allowed to inspect incident reports that are not maintained in the student's file as they are not considered education records. Saddleback Valley Sch. Dist., 57 IDELR 298 (SEA CA 2011). The issue turned on the location where the incident reports were kept within the school district. The IDEA permits parent's access to their children's education records. In this matter, the child who was enrolled in special education had twice been injured on her school's playground. On the first occasion, she fell, broke the foot-ankle brace she needed for support and bruised her calf. The second resulted in the injury of her wrist. The mother requested copies of the reports but her requests were denied. She subsequently filed a due process complaint alleging that the school district denied a free appropriate public education (FAPE) by failing to timely provide copies of education records. Because the school district did not keep incident reports in the student's file, the ALJ concluded they were not education records. The ALJ took notice that school district kept the incident reports in its risk management department at its business office; thus the reports weren't related to student's private education interests. It bears mentioning, however, the case did not specifically provide whether Parents tried to get the incident reports via a subpoena duces tecum. This may be a viable tool obtain the incident reports if a due process claim is filed.

Contact Our Office

If you have any questions about your child's special education services, Contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information.

We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you.

Does My Child Belong In A Special Day Class?

You just had an IEP meeting, and the school district offered your child a change of placement from general education to a special day class. What do you do? You may be wondering if this placement is appropriate for your child, even though the school district personnel told you it was. You may be wondering what other options are available?

Different school districts refer to the special day class (or SDC) environment differently. Some refer to a special education classroom, others refer to specialized academic instruction. If your child is being offered, or is currently placed in, an environment where they are in a classroom with all special education children for 50% of their school day or more, that is a SDC. As with all special education placements and services, this is sometimes appropriate for children and sometimes is not.

In deciding whether a SDC placement is appropriate for your child, ask yourself a few questions: (1) How severe are my child's needs/deficits; (2) What placements and services have been attempted already by the school to help my child and failed; (3) Has there been a discussion directly regarding keeping my child in the general education environment and why that is not appropriate? These are just some of the things that must go into a determination of the appropriateness of placement in a SDC.

The attorneys at Augustin Egelsee LLP have extensive experience with placement issues, and can guide you through review of your child's records to determining whether or not a SDC is an appropriate placement.

Contact Our Office

If you have any questions about your child's special education services, contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information.

We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you.

Autism Rises to 1 in 88 Students

Students diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders can be eligible for special education services through their local school districts under the criteria of Autism. School districts have recently faced a strain on providing special education related services and supports with nation-wide budget cuts. It is expected that this budget will become even more strained as children diagnosed with Autism has recently grown.

This week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released its projection that the number of children diagnosed with Autism has now grown to 1 in 88, doubling from the previous projection of 1 in 156. There are various theories surmising that this rise could be attributed to environmental factors, better diagnostic tools or greater awareness of the disorder.

Either way, school districts are going to start feeling the impact as more and more students become eligible for services due to their diagnosis of Autism (even though a medical diagnosis differs from special education criteria, it is more than likely that a large number with diagnoses will also be eligible for special education services). With such a large population entering special education programs, it would be logical to start constructing public schools specifically designed for students with Autism and other specially designed programs, but with limited funding, it may become impossible for districts to provide even a basic floor of services.

Contact Our Office

If you have any questions about your child's special education services, Contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information.

We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you.

Exhaustion Administrative Remedies

The general rule regarding claims under IDEA provides a parent must first file any actions in administrative court before they can move forward into federal court. This doctrine is referred to as "exhaustion of administrative remedies ." The most talked about special education ruling of 2011 dealt specifically with this doctrine and how it relates when a parent is not alleging a claim under IDEA but rather a claim under Section 1983 (discrimination) for their disabled child. Payne v. Peninsula School District, 57 IDELR 31 (9th Cir. 2011). This case will not be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court as certiorari was denied on February 21, 2012. This case centered on the misuse of a time-out room for a child with disabilities. The Parents claimed the child's rights under section 1983 were violated and filed in federal court. The case was dismissed at the district court level as the court indicated Parents should have filed with the CA Office of Administrative Hearings rather than federal court. The 9th Circuit held that the District court erred in dismissing a properly pleaded Section 1983 claim. The court reasoned that the application of the IDEA's exhaustion requirement turns on the relief sought rather than the injury alleged. Specifically, the 9th Circuit observed that exhaustion is required when a parent seeks: 1) an IDEA remedy such as tuition reimbursement; 2) a change in student's program or placement; and 3) the enforcement of rights arising from a denial of FAPE.

We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you

Contact Our Office

Contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information.

Angelman Syndrome and Special Education

Angelman Syndrome ("AS") is a genetic disorder that causes developmental disabilities and neurological problems, such as difficulty speaking, balancing and walking and, in some cases, seizures. Frequent smiles and outbursts of laughter are common for people with AS, and many have happy, excitable personalities.

Characteristic AS signs and symptoms include:

•Developmental delays, including lack of crawling or babbling at 6 to 12 months, low cognitive abilities

•Lack of or minimal speech

•Inability to walk, move or balance well (ataxia)

•Trembling movement of arms and legs

•Frequent smiling and laughter

•Happy, excitable personality

Other signs and symptoms may include:

•Seizures, usually beginning between 2 and 3 years of age

•Stiff or jerky movements

•Small head size, with flatness in the back of the head

•Crossing of the eyes

•Tongue thrusting

•Walking with arms up in the air

•A lower jaw that juts out

•Light pigmentation in hair, skin and eyes (hypopigmentation)

AS is a rare disorder that most people have never heard of. However, much research is being conducted to find a cure and efforts to educate the public continue at this time. In fact, NBC profiled a family in Los Angeles and their beautiful son in 2010. The story is very educational and heartwarming. http://www.cureangelman.org/newsandevents-video.html

Most children with AS present with many unique cognitive, educational, social, physical and communication challenges. Educational interventions must be comprehensive, within the least restrictive environment and uniquely designed for each individual child. Many options may be appropriate for children with AS including a self-contained classroom, general education placement with aide support or a separate school for children with special needs.

It is also very important for children with AS to exposed to typical peers as frequently as possible. No particular placement is optimal for all students with AS. Additionally, related services are extremely important for children with AS including speech and language, occupational therapy, physical therapy, adaptive physical education and augmentative communication services.

Contact Our Office: If you have any questions about your child's special education services, Contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information. We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you.

What Is "Child Find?"

"Child Find" is a concept that refers to the affirmative, ongoing obligation of states and local school districts to identify, locate, and evaluate all children with disabilities residing within the jurisdiction that either have or are suspected of having disabilities and need special education as a result of those disabilities. The Individuals With Disabilities In Education Act ("IDEA") includes a "child find" mandate that all children with special education needs be evaluated and that their needs be identified and special education services be provided where applicable.

It is important to note that a school district's duty is not strictly dependent on any request by the parent for special education testing or referral for services. The duty arises with the district's knowledge of facts tending to establish a suspected disability and the need for IDEA special education services. Courts have found that it does not take a lot of evidence to trigger a school district's Child Find duties. Consistent low grades, low scores on state testing, behavior issues or sharp changes in your child's grades or behavior can all trigger a school district's duty to provide special education assessment.

A school district's unawareness of a student's possible disability and need for special education and related services will not relieve the school district of its child find obligation if it should have suspected that a student might have a disability. Failing to meet child find requirements has been determined by multiple courts to be a matter of serious concern that can deprive of FAPE a student who should have been identified, possibly entitling him to compensatory education or tuition reimbursement accruing from the time the district first should have suspected the disability.

While a school district has the Child Find mandate, it may attempt pre-referral interventions before referring a student for an IDEA evaluation (such as Student Study Team meetings or possibly even a 504 Plan). However, a school district violates its child find duty by repeatedly referring a student for interventions rather than evaluating the student's need for special education and related services.

The attorneys at Augustin Egelsee have a wealth of experience dealing with Child Find-related issues, whether your child has never been identified or has been assessed, qualified and subsequently disqualified.

Contact Our Office

Contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information.

Private School Vouchers for Special Ed Students

For children eligible for special education services, public schools are often where the parents look to for placement. In looking at the continuum of placement options, if a school district is unable to provide a student with an appropriate public school placement, they fund the student's placement at a private facility. These placements often come in the form of "non-public schools" or "residential treatment centers," depending on the child's needs. If a parent decides to unilaterally place their child in a private placement they have to bear the costs of such placement and determine whether to seek reimbursement from the district later. Wisconsin, however, is trying to eliminate the need for parents of special education students to utilize school districts in funding their children's placements.

According to the Associated Press, this past week the Wisconsin State Assembly passed a bill that would make private school vouchers available for special education students. It still needs to pass the state senate, but if ratified it would make $13,500 available to each special education student to choose their preferred school. The Associated Press reported that those in support of the bill feel that this would help special education students go to private schools if they are not getting the services they need from their public schools. Those in opposition, however, believe this will only further deplete necessary funds for public education.

No one will really know the positive or negative effects of the bill until it passes. But one thing is for sure, if the voucher program is successful in servicing special education students, other states will look to passing similar programs and it could drastically shape special education and special education laws in this country.

Contact Our Office

If you have any questions about your child's special education services, Contact us by email or call us at 714-602-1498 or 866-781-7723 (toll free) for more information.

We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you.

Call Us Now Or Use The Form Below

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close